Modern life has a way of making us feel time-crunched and pressured to find the most efficient ways of using the precious hours when we\u2019re not sleeping. The trendy fitness regimen high-intensity interval training, or HIIT, epitomizes this feeling.<\/p>\n
HIIT promises the best workout in the least amount of time. Runners have used interval training for more than 100 years, alternating between sprints and jogging to improve their endurance. But HIIT didn\u2019t really go mainstream until about a decade ago, when exercise physiologists started to come out with study after study demonstrating that intervals could deliver the biggest health improvement for your exercise time. In 2013, the seven-minute workout, popularized by the New York Times, appeared on the scene, and by 2016, the one-minute workout.<\/p>\n
Recently, fitness professionals voted HIIT one of the top fitness trends for 2020 in a survey by the American College of Sports Medicine. And interval-based workouts are now popping up seemingly everywhere: at chains like Shred415 and Orangetheory, in group classes at YMCAs, on apps and YouTube, even in the routines outlined in Oprah\u2019s O magazine. Often they promise to burn fat and \u201cmetabolically charge the body,\u201d as Orangetheory puts it, in a short time period.<\/p>\n
But there are some important nuances scientists have learned about HIIT that have gotten lost in the hype. The proven benefits of these workouts relate to a very particular type of interval training, and they\u2019ve got nothing to do with weight loss. Here are six basic questions about HIIT, answered.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
HIIT workouts generally combine short bursts of intense exercise with periods of rest or lower-intensity exercise. At fitness studios and online, these workouts often mix aerobic and resistance training.<\/p>\n
To be clear, most of the interval workouts researchers have studied focus solely on aerobic exercise. Which means the scientific understanding of interval training is based on a more specific routine than what\u2019s appearing in most gyms, videos, and magazines. And the researchers\u2019 definition matters because when we\u2019re talking about the evidence of benefits, we need to be specific about the kinds of workouts that science was based on.<\/p>\n
When researchers talk about HIIT, they\u2019re referring to workouts that alternate hard-charging intervals, during which a person\u2019s heart rate reaches at least 80 percent of its maximum capacity usually for one to five minutes, with periods of rest or less intense exercise.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
What differentiates HIIT (or SIT) from the steady-state, continuous types of exercise \u2014 jogging at an even pace or walking, for example \u2014 is the intervals, those periods of heart-pounding intensity. If you want to try it, you can simply take a HIIT class, or run or even walk in a way that involves higher-speed and higher-incline bursts.<\/p>\n
If you want a routine that\u2019s been lab-tested, there\u2019s the 4-by-4 from Norway. It involves a warmup, followed by four four-minute intervals (again, where your heart rate reaches past 80 percent of its maximum capacity), each interspersed with a three-minute recovery period, and finished off with a cool-down.<\/p>\n
So, for example, you\u2019d jog for 10 minutes to warm up, then do four four-minute intervals of faster running, with three three-minute intervals of moderate jogging or brisk walking in between, and a five-minute cool down at the end. And you can substitute jogging with other aerobic exercises, such as biking or swimming. The whole routine should take 40 minutes.<\/p>\n
A shorter, and also heavily studied, example of an interval routine is the 10-by-1, which involves 10 one-minute bursts of exercise each followed by one minute of recovery.<\/p>\n
Again, these routines look pretty different from what\u2019s on offer at chains like Orangetheory, CrossFit, or even the seven-minute workout. Even though they\u2019re often referred to as HIIT, they combine cardiovascular exercise with strength training.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Researchers still haven\u2019t figured out exactly why HIIT works to improve aerobic fitness more than continuous types of exercise. But one key hypothesis, Gibala explained, has to do with the heart\u2019s ability to pump blood.<\/p>\n
One measure for blood pumping is something called stroke volume, or the volume of blood that comes out when the heart contracts. And a major determinant of VO2 max is stroke volume.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe maximum amount of blood that comes out of the heart is improved by exercise training,\u201d said Gibala, \u201cand there\u2019s evidence that when you do interval exercise training, the stroke volume increases even more.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There\u2019s no doubt that interval training can be a time-efficient way to burn calories. Researchers have repeatedly shown that people can burn comparable amounts of calories in HIIT routines lasting, say, 20 minutes, compared to longer continuous exercise routines lasting, say, 50 minutes. The reason for that, Gibala said, is that higher-intensity exercise, like intervals, results in a greater disturbance of the body\u2019s homeostasis, \u201cand it literally takes more energy and oxygen to return it to normal basal levels.\u201d (We\u2019ll get to the related \u201cafterburn\u201d effect in a moment.)<\/p>\n
But the question is whether that calorie burn translates into weight loss, and that\u2019s where HIIT falls short. A 2019 systematic review of the trials comparing HIIT and SIT with moderate-intensity continuous training found all workouts performed about the same on fat loss. (Side note: The journal hyped the review\u2019s findings, leading one of the study authors to put them in context in this Twitter thread.)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Many HIIT gyms tout exercise programs that will lead to an \u201cafterburn\u201d or \u201cexcess post-exercise oxygen consumption\u201d \u2014 a period of elevated calorie burn after you exercise.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe afterburn effect is real \u2014 but it\u2019s often overstated,\u201d Gibala said. \u201cWhen we\u2019ve measured it in a lab, we\u2019ve shown that a 20-minute session of intervals can result in same calorie burn over 24 hours as a 50-minute bout of continuous exercise. So that means the afterburn effect is greater after the intervals \u2014 but it peters out after a while.\u201d<\/p>\n
It\u2019s also marginal, he added, not the kind of calorie loss that would lead to lasting weight loss. (I saw the same effect when I entered a metabolic chamber to measure my metabolism. In the periods after I hit the exercise bike, my metabolic rate ramped up \u2014 but only by a few more calories each minute, and the effect wore off within half an hour of exercising.)<\/p>\n
Building more muscles, however, can be a little more helpful for the afterburn. Here\u2019s why: One of the variables that affects your resting metabolic rate is the amount of lean muscle you have. At any given weight, the more muscle on your body, and the less fat, the higher your metabolic rate. That\u2019s because muscle uses a lot more energy than fat while at rest.<\/p>\n
So the logic is if you can build up your muscle and reduce your body fat, you\u2019ll have a higher resting metabolism and more quickly burn the fuel in your body. But that takes work \u2014 a lot more work than a short aerobic HIIT workout. And even a short HIIT workout may not be for everyone.<\/p>\n
\u201cIntervals can be demanding mentally and physically, so some steady-state continuous is nice once in a while,\u201d Gibala said. \u201c[But] for those who truly are super time-pressed and can tolerate intervals almost exclusively, it\u2019s the most efficient way to train.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n